They have identified three major types of skills that, if well done in the classroom, should prepare the average student to find employment. They are:
- basic hihg school level reading and mathematics
- soft skills like team work, problem solving and presentation
- and finally basic computer skills.
In addition to considering what our students need to learn, they share a five points of effective management in corporate America.
1. Ensure that everyone understands the problem. Sometimes you truly are working on two different issues but think they are the same.
2. Design jobs so that there are incentives and opportunities for people to contribute. I think we've all be in a situation where they have asked for our input but not really wanted it - this needs to be avoided.
3. Provide people with the training needed to pursue solutions. This might be learning specific skills, patterns of thinking, etc. The other point they make here is to FOLLOW UP on training - we've all been trainings where there is no follow through. It's a waste of everyone's time.
4. Measure progress on a regular basis. How are we doing, how do we know that we are reaching our goals, etc.
5. Perservere and learn from mistakes. I like this point because it emphasizes that if you are trying something new there will be problems, issues and kinks. This attitude allows you to see them as chances to learn not failures.
This book does not discuss "knowledge management" as a term - but that is basically what they are getting at. But that's another tangent. So this is a quick thumbnail of the book and it is a good read because they use great examples of these principles in action. They have done their research and boiled it down to a few critical elements that business and education should heed. I can see what Citizen Schools has adopted their format to build their programs.
1 comment:
Interesting point. I know a teacher in a Texas school district who teaches computer applications, keyboarding, business skills, stuff like that. In Texas, that's considered vocational-technical coursework, which receives extra money from the state. However, such courses are not considered college prep; thus, they're not tested by TAKS (which is probably a good thing) or considered part of a core curriculum. Interesting, huh? We think enough of skills education to pay for it, but we relegate it to a lower social place because it's not college-oriented. How sad! And how stupid!
Post a Comment